Archive

Rain garden workshop coming on March 6.

A fire station seems like an odd place for a workshop on rain gardens, but Georgetown’s Fire Station No. 3 is a natural choice.
People attending the free March 6 workshop also will be able to see the nine rain gardens that surround the station.
With a $456,000 federal grant, the grounds were transformed last year into a showplace of environmentally sensitive storm water management.
Besides the rain gardens, there is pervious surfaces that allow rain to drain into underground holding tanks.
As part of the grant, the fire station is required to show off its features to help spread information about dealing with storm water runoff. The CDP Engineers who designed the fire station features will be on hand to explain their work after Saturday’s workshop, which is sponsored by the Bluegrass Rain Garden Alliance.
A rain garden is shallow depression in the ground that catches the water that runs off roofs and driveways, and holds it for a while. That allows the water to soak into the ground instead of rushing to a storm sewer. The slow flow through soil and roots results in better water quality.
At the workshop, participants will learn how to find the right spot in their yards for a rain garden, and what types of plants grow best and are best for the environment.

Details:
Rain garden workshop
Free, but registration is required at www.bgPRIDE.org.
1-3 p.m. March 6.
Georgetown Fire Station No. 3, 101 Airport Road (just off U.S. 25), Georgetown.www.bluegrassraingardenalliance.org

Share/Save/Bookmark

Going out for seafood? This guide could save oceans.

Take a look at this guide of what to order and not order:
http://u.nu/6jbt5

Share/Save/Bookmark

Climate change discussion in Frankfort

This from the local UK folks:

“Climate Change Impact on Kentucky”

Art Williams, past commissioner for the Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection and former director of the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District, will address the Frankfort Chapter of the United Nations Association of the USA (UNA-USA) on Monday, February 22, at the Paul Sawyier Public Library at 6:30 p.m.

His topic “From Copenhagen to Frankfort: Impact of Climate Change” will highlight the recent United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen and focus on the impact of climate change on the world, the US and Frankfort.

Mr. Williams, a renowned environmental specialist, has written several articles on climate change and has participated in several major international environmental conferences.

The Frankfort Chapter UNA is launching its 30th year of providing free international education programs to the community. The meeting is free and open to the public. For more information, call 502-223-0512.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Environmentalists line up behind bill calling for eggs in different baskets

Here’s the release:

New Alliance Promotes Clean, Affordable Energy Solutions

Applauds legislation to increase energy efficiency and renewable energy in Kentucky

A new alliance of clean energy businesses and non-profit organizations praised legislation filed yesterday in the Kentucky legislature by Representative Harry Moberly. The legislation sets energy efficiency and renewable energy goals for Kentucky in order to grow high quality local jobs, help stabilize long term energy prices, and promote good health.

The Kentucky Sustainable Energy Alliance (KySEA) says House Bill 408 requires Kentucky’s utilities to generate 12.5% of their retail sales from renewable sources by the year 2020, up from only 2% in 2007. The bill also asks utilities to develop energy efficiency programs to help customers reduce their electricity use by 10.25% over the next decade. Those targets are similar to goals already adopted in several nearby states, including Ohio and North Carolina. The bill builds on momentum created by the federal stimulus program by providing long-term support for comprehensive weatherization programs that help lower income households save money and energy. A provision called a feed-in tariff also expands incentives for renewable energy production without additional cost to the state budget.

“I’m excited about any policy that helps families save money and energy by becoming more energy efficient,” said Mary Love, a member of Kentuckians For The Commonwealth. “This bill provides incentives that can help everyday Kentuckians improve the energy efficiency of our homes. We’ll save money on our power bills, and help create good jobs in all areas of the state. Lowering our energy use also diminishes the need for expensive new power plants, and leads to cleaner air and water and more healthy living conditions for us all.”

“Our organization focuses on providing affordable housing solutions to build better communities and help reduce foreclosures and homelessness,” noted Sherrie Davison of Frontier Housing, based in Morehead. “Home energy costs in Kentucky currently consume more than 20% of annual income for families living at the poverty line, contributing to economic instability and homelessness. The era of cheap electricity is ending, and all Kentucky families need resources, tools and good public policy to make our homes, apartments and manufactured housing more efficient.

“Contracts and jobs continue go to Ohio, Indiana and Tennessee because the Commonwealth lacks up-to-date public policies,” said Matt Partymiller, an owner of Solar Energy Solutions, a company that employs three people in Lexington. “We need things like a renewable portfolio standard and a feed-in tariff just to be competitive with our neighbors and the incentives they offer for renewable energy development.”

“Feed-in tariffs are guaranteed payments made to people who generate renewable electricity onto the power grid,” explained Andy McDonald, director of Kentucky Solar Partnership. “By guaranteeing payments for renewable power under long term contracts, feed-in tariffs create a stable environment that attracts investment and can produce very rapid development of the renewable energy sector, leading to substantial economic development and job creation. Feed-in tariffs enabled Germany to become the world leader in solar energy, and Germany’s renewable energy sector now employs hundreds of thousands of workers.”

“We are thrilled that meaningful clean energy solutions are now on the table,” stated Wallace McMullen, who chairs the Energy Committee of the Sierra Club’s Cumberland Chapter. “This is a golden opportunity for Kentucky. We should make the most of it and move forward to a cleaner, more prosperous, and healthier future for our children and the Commonwealth.”

* * * * * *

KySEA formed in August 2009 with the goal of promoting clean, sustainable and affordable energy solutions for Kentucky. The Alliance currently has 25 members including renewable energy businesses, service organizations, faith and social justice groups, agricultural, environmental and health-based organizations. KySEA seeks to build public support for energy policies that:

§ Make improving energy efficiency Kentucky’s top energy priority.
§ Promote the development of clean, renewable energy and increase the share of our overall energy mix that comes from these sources.
§ Create new jobs and opportunities for Kentuckians, including a just transition for coal communities and workers.
§ Enable all Kentucky residents and businesses to take advantage of energy efficiency and renewable energy solutions.
Additional information about the Kentucky Sustainable Energy Alliance and the potential for energy efficiency and renewable energy in Kentucky can be found at: www.kysea.org.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Horse trails in nature preserves?

By Andy Mead
amead@herald-leader.com
FRANKFORT — Kentucky is known around the world for its horses.

It also has some beautiful, environmentally sensitive lands — the kind of places that Daniel Boone would recognize — that are protected in nature preserves.

Those two things have come into conflict on the Brush and Cumberland mountains in the southeastern corner of the state, where a historic horse trail was closed to protect a delicate ecosystem.

On Thursday, the conflict arrived at a legislative committee meeting in Frankfort.

The Kentucky Horse Council, which claims 3,000 trail-riding members, is backing House Bill 312. It would require agencies that manage “state recreation land” to notify the public of any plans to close foot trails to horses and prove that there is a good reason behind the ban.

State officials would be required to “ensure that equine travel on state recreation land grows and flourishes, in keeping with the commonwealth’s internationally recognized equine heritage.”

Ginny Grulke of Lexington, the council’s executive director, says that riding trails on horseback is a rapidly growing pastime, especially among baby boomers.

But, she said, other states are doing a better job of providing places to ride and reaping tourism dollars.

“If you look across the nation, Kentucky is on the low end of public land available,” Grulke said.

Environmental groups who oppose the bill in its current form say they are in favor of what is called “adventure tourism.” However, they say, nature preserves are “living museums” that should be off limits to horses.

The horse council began working on a potential legislative fix after a horse trail was closed in Harlan County. State agencies “discriminate” against horses in many places in Kentucky, Grulke said, but the Harlan County trail was a last straw.

The trail apparently had been used for more than a century, starting with the 1904 establishment of the Hensley Settlement on Brush Mountain in what now is Cumberland Gap National Historical Park.

In modern times, the trail had been the only way to get into the national park from Harlan County.

The state’s Wild Rivers Program bought 1,600 acres to protect a stream that tumbles down the mountain. In 2006, the land officially became the Martin’s Fork Wildlife Management Area/State Natural Area, and horses were banned.

The area is managed by the rivers program, the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources and the Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.

Besides the stream, the area contains nine plants and three animals that the Nature Preserves Commission considers endangered, threatened or of special concern.

Horses, or any pets, aren’t allowed in nature preserves or natural areas.

Don Dott, executive director of the commission, said that horses can bring in the seeds of invasive species on their hooves, coats or manure. The invasive species can then out-compete native species, driving them to the brink of extinction.

Nature preserves are open to hikers. But having to provide trails sturdy enough to accommodate horses and finding room to park horse trailers would strain his agency’s limited budget and staff, Dott said.

He said it would be difficult to prove that opening a specific nature preserve trail to horses would, for example, introduce an invasive plant such as garlic mustard. But invasives already are a major problem in every preserve, he said.

Grulke and Dott testified Thursday before the House Tourism Development and Energy Committee.

Also testifying were people who ride horses or run businesses that cater to horseback riders, and environmental groups.

Tom FitzGerald, executive director of the Kentucky Resources Council, said that nature preserves have no place in the proposed legislation.

“They are not ’state recreation areas,’ they are remnant natural communities,” he said.

Committee members took turns voicing their support for horses and tourism.

But Rep. Jim Gooch, D-Providence, warned that opening state lands to horses could spur demands by other groups, such as people who ride off-road vehicles.

Several committee members said the opposing sides need to get together and work toward a compromise.

At the end of a two-hour hearing, the committee chairman, Rep. Eddie Ballard, D-Madisonville, strongly suggested that negotiations take place. HB 312 “needs a lot of work done on it,” he said.

Reach Andy Mead at (859) 231-3319 or 1-800-950-6397, Ext. 3319.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Follow coal plant air quality hearing on Twitter, Facebook

Environmentalists opposed to East Kentucky Power Cooperative’s proposed coal-burning plant in Clark County will be attending a public hearing on an air quality permit for the plant on Thursday, Feb. 4.
The hearing begins at 6:30 p.m. at Clark County Cooperative Extension,
1400 Fortune Drive in Winchester.
A half hour before the hearing, several people will be speaking about pollution and health impacts from the plant. That group includes Dr. Vicki Holmberg, a Lexington physician.

The environmentalists say there will be live updates from the hearing on Twitter (#STOPSMITH) and
Facebook (Group name: No New Coal Plants in Clark County!).

Environmentalists have been trying for years to stop the project, now known as Smith 1. So far, only limited, but potentially significant, success: At the request of Wendell Berry and others, the Kentucky Public Service Commission has opened an investigation into whether the plant is needed.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Can clean coal be Lorax-clean? Dr. Seuss’ people say no.

From the New York Times:

The company that protects the copyrights on the works of Theodor Geisel, better known as the children’s book author Dr. Seuss, has sent a cease-and-desist letter to a Massachusetts company looking to get into the coal business under the name Lorax — the title character of a story published in 1971.

“There’s no reason for them to use the term,” said Karl ZoBell, the longtime lawyer for Dr. Seuss Enterprises, “except to purloin the good will attached to the book and use it for a company that appears to be the opposite of everything the book is about.”

Read the rest of the article: http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/of-dr-seuss-and-coal-gasification/

Share/Save/Bookmark

University of Kentucky students want coal off campus; offers T-shirts

A new UK Beyond Coal group is holding its first meeting on the campus Monday night.
Here’s where to find out more: http://ukbeyondcoal.wordpress.com

And here’s a press release about it (the press release is missing the time and precise location of the meeting; the web site says it’s 8:30 p.m.in room 357).

Back to School? Not for Coal
University of Kentucky Part of New Campaign to Kick Coal off Campuses

Lexington, KY: UK Beyond Coal launched a new campaign on campus to move the University of Kentucky beyond coal, part of the Sierra Club’s nationwide effort on more than 60 campuses. The group aims to close polluting coal plants, like that on UK’s campus, and replace them with cleaner energy options and energy efficiency.

“We’re focusing on campuses because universities should be leaders in technological innovation and sustainability, creating models for green society,” said Bruce Nilles, Director of the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal Campaign. “Campuses should be places of learning, development and growth where young adults can thrive, not homes to dangerous and polluting 19th century technology.”

Already the Sierra Student Coalition, working with students across the country, has been part of a national movement to secure commitments from over 600 universities to reduce their carbon emissions to zero through the Presidents Climate Commitment. One of these committed universities is the University of Louisville, one of UK’s biggest rivals. Yet many schools, including UK, continue to rely on coal to meet their energy needs. In fact over 60 campuses own coal plants on campus, making it impossible to meet the zero emissions goal.

While UK is taking notable steps to become a greener campus, such as recycling in all the academic buildings, improving bike lanes/paths, and hiring Ameresco to help put energy efficiency projects in motion all over campus, the campus still relies on dirty coal. One of these coal plants on campus is over 50 years old.

“UK is on the right track towards becoming a greener community, but needs to just take that last step and become a coal-free campus. Other top-notch universities around the country, such as Cornell, are already moving beyond coal and I think UK should follow suit. I think more research on renewable energy resources and implementing that research on UK’s campus could help UK become a Top 20 Research Institution,” says Allison Roland, a first year at UK.

UK Beyond Coal is holding a Kick Off Meeting on Monday, February 1 in Room 357 of the student center. Over sixty students are expected to attend and take part in the meeting’s activities. Keynote speaker, Tanya Turner, from eastern Kentucky, will talk about the impact of coal in her region as well as what it means to have a coal plant at UK, the flagship for the rest of the state. Students will work on different aspects of the campaign such as media, grassroots pressure, event planning and coalitions with faculty, alumni and student organizations. The meeting will Kick Off the campaign on UK’s campus to move the campus off coal.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tackling climate change in a coal state

By Andy Mead
amead@herald-leader.com
FRANKFORT — In Kentucky, where global warming skeptics are given a warm welcome before coal-friendly legislative committees, a major effort to rein in climate change began Thursday.

The Kentucky Climate Action Plan Council, whose members were appointed last month, held its first meeting Thursday, with an eye toward having a series of policy recommendations by the end of the year.

Its task, as defined by state government: “Identify opportunities for Kentucky to respond to the challenge of global climate change while becoming more energy efficient, more energy independent, and spurring economic growth.”

The purpose of the group is not to debate climate science, said Len Peters, secretary of the state Energy and Environment Cabinet and chairman of the climate council.

“The whole issue…has entered into the realm of politics at this point,” he said. “Whether you are a nay-sayer or you think the science is right…we want to get beyond that. The nation, the world, is saying we need to more forward in this regard.”

Although burning coal is considered one of the major human-generated causes of climate change, the state’s coal industry apparently has little to fear from the council.

Coal is used to generate half the nation’s electricity, and more than 90 percent of Kentucky’s electricity.

Peters said as the state looks forward to the next 10 or 15 years, an important consideration will be remaining competitive with other states on the cost of electricity.

The council will look at things such as clean coal technology, burning renewable fuel along with coal, and capturing and burying the carbon dioxide from coal, he said, “keeping those rates low and at the same time reducing carbon.”

Peters said the council’s work will mesh well with the work of a task force that recommended more use of renewable energy sources, and Gov. Steve Beshear’s November 2008 energy plan that set a goal of significantly reducing greenhouse gases while increasing jobs.

Reducing carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions won’t be easy.

From 1990 to 2005, Kentucky’s emissions increased at double the national rate, according to a draft report prepared for the council. Kentucky emissions rose 33 percent over the period; nationwide emissions rose 16 percent.

The report was prepared by the Center for Climate Strategies, a nonpartisan, nonprofit group formed in 2004 to help governments with climate change issues.

Tom Peterson, CCS’s president and CEO, said that at least other states have prepared climate change plans like the one Kentucky is beginning.

The state is paying CCS $200,000 to work with the climate council. Another $97,500 is coming from the Blue Moon Foundation and the Turner Foundation.

On Thursday, the council heard a long list of things that other states are doing to curb greenhouse gases. They ranged from demand-side management, where a homeowner can see how much electricity he is using and turn off unnecessary appliances, to dealing with the methane emitted by cows.

Deciding which of those policies to recommend for Kentucky will be the responsibility of the 31-member council and technical committees that will include members of the council and others with scientific or other expertise.

The council includes Lexington Mayor Jim Newberry (who sent a representative in his place Thursday) and state and federal officials. It also includes people from the coal, aluminum, lumber and automobile industries, and only two or three people who could be identified as environmentalists.

That didn’t escape Tona Barkley, a member of the Frankfort Climate Action Network, who sat through the 5 1/2 hour meeting to speak during a public comment period at the end.

She said the council was a great idea, but added that she would like to see more environmentalists on it. Peters, the chairman, suggested that more people could be added to the technical committees.

The only other member of the public to speak was Connie Lemley, a farmer, who also talked about what the council was missing: People who could speak for inhabitants of island nations that could be submerged by rising sea levels, African farmers hit by droughts caused by a changing climate, polar bears, and birds that migrate hundreds or thousands of miles only to find out that the insects they always depended on are not around.

“I guess one of my real concerns about meetings like this is that the solutions that seem feasible are not really what we need to do,” she said.

To learn more about the Kentucky Climate Action Plan Council, go to www.kyclimatechange.us.

Reach Andy Mead at (859) 231-3319 or 1-800-950-6397, Ext. 3319.

Share/Save/Bookmark

School lunches, part III

Did you see the story we had last week about how Fayette County is removing deep fryers from some schools?

I was stunned to see that schools have and use deep fryers in 2010. They have been removed from 19 schools.

Here’s the nut graph from that story:

Those schools now are baking or broiling foods that already were flash-fried — fried briefly at high temperatures — before being frozen and delivered to the schools, says Marty Flynn, the district’s child nutrition coordinator.

They’re still fried. Now they just aren’t fried twice. Great.

And then these nuggets:

Even though the 19 schools have removed frying equipment, more than 30 others still have it, Flynn said. Frying equipment is being removed each time a school is renovated, and no frying equipment is being placed in new schools, Flynn said. The goal is to eliminate all deep fryers.

Meanwhile, in schools that still have frying equipment, moves are under way to reduce the amount of frying or to use healthier, zero trans-fat oils when foods are fried, according to district officials.

That means they are still using them and those chicken strips flash-fried by the vendor are still fried again, right?

One of the photos with the story shows a student’s lunch tray at Russell Cave Elementary, one of the 19 schools to remove the fryers.

It showed once-fried chicken strips, a few orange slices and some unidentifiable fruit in a cup (which most likely means canned), a whole wheat roll and chocolate milk. Two fruits, great. Whole wheat roll, good. Once-friend chicken, not so much.  Chocolate milk? Not good, especially if he grabs it five times a week (this was on an average Tuesday).

I got slammed by commenters after the first blog I did on how unhealthy school lunches are. I wrote then that they don’t seem to have progressed much since I was in school, back in the dark ages.

This doesn’t help their argument.

And, frankly, it’s just wrong, especially in a state with one of the highest child obesity rates in the country.

I had a long conversation with Marty Flynn after that first posting and she told me some of the good things happening in the school cafeterias, like switching to whole wheat breads and adding fresh fruit. But, really? They’re still double-frying foods more than half the schools?

Don’t tell me kids won’t drink or eat healthy things. Kids will eat what you put in front of them, especially if you don’t offer sugar-laden and/or high-salt and/or deep-fried crap beside the healthy stuff.

Why not just bake or broil the chicken without it being fried to start with? It might take a little more time to make sure the chicken is cooked, but aren’t kids worth that effort?

I think they are.

— Linda J.

Share/Save/Bookmark